Going on week two of random mid-sleep wakeups wherein I am convinced I have badly overslept and missed my entire shift.
What even is causing this? (Don't say stress, I'm sure it's stress! But what is causing the stress!? Is it lack of sleep? Because the lack of sleep sure ain't helping, gotta say.)
Chapters:
8/8
Fandom:
Good Omens (TV), Doctor Who (2005)
Rating:
Teen And Up Audiences
Warnings:
No Archive Warnings Apply
Relationships:
Aziraphale/Crowley (Good Omens), Aziraphale & Crowley (Good Omens)
Characters:
Aziraphale (Good Omens), Crowley (Good Omens), Metatron (Good Omens), Muriel (Good Omens), Tenth Doctor (Doctor Who), Harry Watson, Donna Noble
Additional Tags:
Time Travel Fix-It, Fix-It, Post-Episode: s02e06 Every Day (Good Omens), Episode Fix-it: s02e06 Every Day (Good Omens), POV Muriel (Good Omens), POV Aziraphale (Good Omens), Snake Crowley (Good Omens), Holy Water (Good Omens), Time Loop, POV Crowley (Good Omens)
Series:
Part 4 of A Nightingale Sang, Part 10 of Wild About Harry
Summary:
Both Aziraphale and Crowley wish they could have handled their last conversation differently; but there’s no going back now. In real life, you can’t just reset the props and do another take.
Not unless you have a time machine. Or know someone who does.
Ten, Donna Noble, and Harry Watson* try to repair Aziraphale and Crowley’s relationship without causing the world to end. It turns out to be more complicated than they expected. But if at first you don’t succeed…you can always create a time loop.
***
*Harry Watson is technically a canon character in Sherlock; but in this story she is essentially an original character from my Wild About Harry series, and no knowledge of Sherlock is necessary. For the full experience, you may want to read “Recovery” first, which explains how Harry and Donna met and why they are now both part timelord.
This story assumes that most readers will be pretty familiar with the canon events depicted in S2 E6, “Every Day.” Especially the last fifteen minutes.
I know we only had 1 episode and whole plotlines were scrapped but I was just left feeling so empty after the finale given how powerful and moving and profound the themes of season 1/the book were. So buckle up for a long ride let’s talk about it
Theme 1: Human Incarnate
The book and the show established that humanity is unique because it is neither purely good or purely bad. From the book: “Most of the great triumphs and tragedies of history are caused not by people being fundamentally good or fundamentally evil, but by people being fundamentally people.” This Aziraphale describes as “much better” than either Heaven or Hell
This is one of my favorite sequences in the whole show. And the music is soaring and gorgeous. Adam recalls the things in his life he has come to know and love; his parents, his friends, his dog, his home. He makes it have nice weather all year. Aziraphale could feel that love at the Tadfield Manor. Heaven and Hell tried to create an instrument of destruction. But by putting that inside a human boy, they didn’t realize the strength of one boy’s love would be strong enough to literally burn the hell out of him. He told Satan himself to shove it and rewrote reality to have the dad he truly loved. The power of humanity’s love is stronger than any immortal power could ever be.
This is the idea that would have been so cool for the finale but unfortunately never paid off. As the second coming prepares to destroy Earth again, Aziraphale and Crowley could have teamed up with the power of humanity to reshape heaven and hell for good. Adam and Jesus as the antichrist and christ born to end the world and instead used their humanity to save it. Instead we got the book-of-life arc and humans were literally left to dust
Theme 2: Free Will
Next good omens establishes that angels and demons are just puppets but humans are the ones with real free will because they have the ability to be good or bad. Even with heaven and hell, the humans on Earth always have a choice. In season 2, they agree on this, but Crowley’s main grievance is the inequity of it all. Humans have free will but it still isn’t fair.
God made angels and demons and humans but the humans never had to follow her ‘plan.’ Free will and the ability to recognize what is truly right outside the propaganda of good vs evil is what saves the world.
Humans always had free will, even if God was around to kill a bunch of them with floods or take their stuff to win bets or something. Creating a new universe without God wouldn’t change that. They would still have free will, just less threats from above/below, I guess. What Crowley’s established character really should have wanted here was to fix the inequity inherent in human society. That’s what is truly holding them back, not a lack of will. Removing God from the universe doesn’t actually solve the root problem here
Theme 3: Our Own Side
This is something Crowley learned very early and spends the whole show trying to teach Aziraphale. That good must be separated from heaven and bad must be separated from hell.
Heaven can do some truly appalling horrors and demons, at least Crowley (and somewhat Beelzebub I guess) have the potential to be kind. 'Their own side’ is one where they have the freedom of humanity, to do what is truly right. Aziraphale and Crowley sort of found their way there in the finale, but it was all rushed and Aziraphale never really turned his back on heaven, it sort of just became irrelevant when everything started disappearing. What a beautifully flawed and nice world they could have created together
Theme 4: Love Conquers all
What was it all for? Love. God made Aziraphale and Crowley for each other because she liked to smile at the silliness of their love. The literal only constant in the entire universe. Their love for the world and each other saved it. I think the decision to turn Aziraphale and Crowley’s queer love story into a tragedy was the biggest mistake of seasons 2/3. Forcing the soft and romantic comedy of good omens into a queer tragedy was the instant it all crashed and burned. Now everything is tainted leading up to the pain and destruction of it all and the whimsy and lightness is gone. There were moments of it, but it was all leading toward the end. And queer love deserves to not be a tragedy. We have far too much tragic queer love in our society. Yes we got the south downs, but Aziraphale and Crowley never got to experience that freedom. They finally came together just to instantly be destroyed. We deserve happy and fulfilling queer love that is sweet without the bitter parts. Good omens was intended to be a comedy, not a tragedy
And then this was SUCH A COOL IDEA they introduced. Perhaps the first time ever an angel and a demon performed a miracle together. The power of their love could create magic stronger than anything heaven or hell had ever seen. I was so excited to see the wonders they were going to create, they ways in which they could have rebuilt the world better using that love. If they had this kind of power doing a tiny miracle, what could they have accomplished if they really put their minds to it? God herself couldn’t have stopped them. And instead, the finale literally revoked Crowley’s magic for the entire episode. They sacrifice themselves for a new earth and people that didn’t even exist yet instead of using any of their power to change it. The god awful execution of this theme is probably the biggest letdown of the entire finale imo
Theme 5: Fix It, Don’t Replace It
This is so obviously established in seasons ½ I cannot believe how badly they missed the mark with this one
Literally shows us the horror of replacing the Earth with all new people. Even children can recognize that just because something is broken, it doesn’t mean you throw it away and start all over. They loved the world enough to want to save it. The world is inherently worth saving, flaws and all. If you love something, you don’t abandon it. The ENTIRE PLOT of season 1 explores the horrors of humanity and yet humans, Aziraphale and Crowley do everything in their power to save it.
It absolutely blows my mind how directly this scene contradicts the entire message of the finale. Job didn’t want new children, he quite liked the old ones. Aziraphale and Crowley didn’t want the antichrist’s new Earth, they quite liked the old one. We didn’t want new human versions of Aziraphale and Crowley, we QUITE LIKED THE OLD ONES. Where the hell did that mentality go when they told God to create an entirely new universe????????????? Season 1 said the world is flawed but it deserves saving exactly as it is. Season 1 said an angel and a demon go off to the ritz together, exactly as they are. The finale said the world is too broken, we have to make it disappear and start over. The finale said Aziraphale and Crowley have too many issues/traumas to be happy, we have to destroy them and start over. That’s why as cute as Asa and Anthony’s love is, we quite liked them exactly as they were, angel/demon trauma + history and all. They deserved saving too.
Good omens has always been so special to me for how much it pokes fun at but also celebrates the messiness and wonder of humanity and love. The 6-to-1 episodes was a major setback but somehow the finale still managed to drop basically every one of its most endearing and powerful messages. What is the “real world” the finale is trying to make us value? One without a god to screw things up sometimes?? The best parts of humanity always shined through not even despite, but BECAUSE of the heavenly challenges they overcame. It’s very clear good omens as a whole was always meant to be a one-season/one-book story. There was so much potential and missed opportunities and I wish we could have had the finale we were all dreaming of. I will always love the world of good omens season 1/the book, so that is the world I’ll keep in my heart. And all the nightingales therein
I want to teach myself to do audiobooks… because audiobooks are expensive. If I get good enough at it to DIY ones to sell, I can do my own for FREE.
So I started with one of my newsletter extras. By the way, if you’re not on my newsletter? There are a lot of newsletter extras. Like, a lot.
I started with The Hunting Trip, It’s only about 10,000 words (Immortal Gifts is 96,000; Love Stories is in the 40,000s), so it was faster for a n00b. 😀
I’m totally a n00b and it’s not perfect, but apparently I do remember my high school acting. 😉
I was also a bit taken aback to see that there is a Centre of Jain Studies at the University of Birmingham, though on a spot of further looking around I find that there is also a Jain Ashram in Birmingham. (Not of as great antiquity as the Shah Jahan Mosque in Woking, f. 1889, and featuring in HG Wells' The War of the Worlds.)
While one might think that this collection of South Asian origin might return there: article points out that there are hardly any Jains left in Pakistan, where a significant tranche of the mss came from. I also wonder - it is not mentioned in the article - what is the position of Jainism at present in India. Some sources I have looked at suggest it is relatively assimilated to Hinduism? The article refers to them as a 'fragmented community'.
The Wikipedia article does suggest that they have a long tradition of being involved in commerce, banking and trade, and founding an array of philanthropic enterprises, including libraries....
The Curve of the World is Vonda McIntyre’s last gift to us, and it is magnificent. In this alternate history of the ancient world, where Minoans build a globe-spanning trading community, Vonda has taken up the challenge of her good friend Ursula K. Le Guin and become a dreamer of a wider reality, creating a glorious vision of a working world. The Curve of the World is the sum and summit of all Vonda McIntyre was as a writer and as a human being, a marvellous vision of how the world might have been, perhaps once was, and might, still, one day be. The world needs this novel.
But don’t read this book because it’s Good For You. Read it because it’s a real story about a genuine alternative to our world featuring true grownups—and all the delights and, well, ‘learning opportunities’ attendant on that. Seriously, reading this book feels like sitting by a driftwood fire at dusk, while the waves slish and salt-scented breeze dries the tears of joy on your cheeks—the kind of joy that comes from feeling peace and rightness and rootedness in a world just waiting for you to walk it.
I loved Vonda. In 2019 she fought to stay alive to do her final rewrite—of a novel she began in the early aughts but then abandoned when she felt dispirited by her career. (I have a lot to say about this, but not here.) Kelley and I were delighted when sometime after she was Guest of Honour at the 2015 Worldcon (2016? I don’t remember) she told us she was working on it again. Not so very long after that, she gave us the first complete draft to read. We did, and as always between long-time writer friends, we had many long conversations about what worked and what could be better.
She went back to work on it again. But then she was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and suddenly the clock was ticking—ticking very, very fast.
Vonda fought to stay alive to finished this book. It was just days after she saved the file that she entered the final days of round-the-clock hospice care at home. Sadly, my father died during that time so we couldn’t be here for her final days—we had to fly to the UK to deal with family stuff, Dad’s estate etc—but we’d said our goodbyes. I only wish she could be here to see this day. Please buy the book.
Praise
”A gentle elegiac tone pervades this stunning posthumous historical fantasy from multi–Hugo and Nebula award winner McIntyre (Dreamsnake), who died in 2019. In ancient Crete, Iakinthu, a former bull dancer, is at the apex of her second profession as chief diplomat-trader of her seafaring nation. To fulfill Minoan tradition, she must take her adopted son, Rhenthizu, to meet his birth mother in a faraway land no Minoan has ever visited, after which he will choose which woman to live with. Their epic journey plays out as a feminist odyssey through six distinctive and mostly matriarchal cultures, superbly constructed around permutations of myth and legend. McIntyre’s scene-setting is lush and immersive, and her finely drawn, women-led cast leaps off the page as they confront obstacles with wit and wisdom. This sensitive and captivating voyage of discovery is a fitting capstone to a remarkable career.” —Publishers Weekly, May 2026
“The Curve of the World is magnificent, a glorious vision of a wider reality: a world in which global commerce and fairness are not a contradiction in terms. It is the sum and summit of all Vonda McIntyre was as a writer and human being, her last, best gift to a world in sore need of hope.” —Nicola Griffith, author of Ammonite and Hild
“I loved this book! It’s a glorious adventure with a heart as big as the world! Iakinthu Gephyra is a diplomat, trader, explorer, and the ‘bridge between people’ who strives to understand and accept cultures that are not her own. To find the family of her adopted child, she sets forth on the most difficult voyage her people have ever undertaken, sailing beyond the Sunset Sea and across the Nameless Ocean. A fascinating exploration of culture, family, and identity, about finding your way and discovering where you belong.” —Pat Murphy, author The Adventures of Mary Darling and The Wild Girls
“A vivid, luminous novel. As Minoan traders travel the ancient world, McIntyre brings to richly imagined life six distinctive cultures of antiquity, all touched with magic. The characters are so real that I could see, feel, even smell them, and I passionately wanted each to succeed at their various quests. The Curve Of The World is a wonderful capstone to a storied career.” —Nancy Kress, author of Observer
“Vonda takes us from the known world, a world with known dangers and known comforts, into the unknown, the wild but civilized West. As she herself looked ahead to the journey from life into death, she opens to us a world filled with unrealized possibilities. This is a marvelous book of the civilizations that could have been.” —Eileen Gunn, author of Stable Strategies for Middle Management and Questionable Practices
“The Curve of the World is full of daring, and rich and rare invention, but feeling true, as far as can be known, to the mysterious, apparently/ probably women-centered, ancient Minoan culture. I loved the giving of beautiful gifts, between chance voyagers meeting on the ocean. So much better than mere trade. A wonderful book.” —Gwyneth Jones, author of Life and Bold as Love
There's still time to get memberships to Quantum-Con, where I'll be a GoH this weekend: https://quantum-con.org/
Despite being one of the guests of honor, I have a pretty light schedule... Good news for you! That just means there's more time for you and I to hangout and chat!
================= FRIDAY
6:00pm-6:30pm
Prog 1 (Conf E) – Opening Ceremonies
SATURDAY 4:00 pm - 5:00 pm
Prog 2 (Studio 2)
Vampires: Are They Dead Yet? Vampires, as fantasy (anti-)hero, never seem to fully die. Are they in a slump now or are their signs of their inevitable return from the dead? Are people reading any good new vampire romances? What movies, tv series, etc., featuring vampires are on the horizon?
Tate Halloway* Hallaway
8:00pm-12:00am
Come join us at the Fire Pit! We will roast marshmallows and discuss spooky paranormal things. Tate Halloway* Hallaway and other dignitaries will be stopping by throughout the evening!
SUNDAY
3:30pm-4:00pm
Prog 1 (Conf E) – Closing Ceremonies
=====================
I am planning to do my usual convention report, so look forward to that even if you can't join me this weekend for what I'm certain will be an INTERESTING time! (I might even be UNIQUE. We shall see!)
---
*I have talked to the con com about the fact that my pen name is misspelled throughout the programming page, but as the convention begins today, I suspect that it will not be corrected "in time" (since the time is nigh!)
That’s right y’all, you’re getting another flower picture! I know, I can hardly believe it myself, but spring is just turning out so beautifully here and I just feel so compelled to share the blossoms with you.
Today’s bloom is a peony (I think), from a peony bush along the side of the house:
I am thrilled to have another beautiful blooming plant in the yard, especially because it’s pink! It’s actually very close to where the wisteria is, too. Also this one is in the shape of a heart:
That genuinely made me smile so much while I was taking the photo. Like, how cute is that.
I hope y’all are having a great start to your weekend, and that you see many blooms this spring!
It’s not as warm and cuddly as “The Blue Carbuncle;” it’s not as creepy as “The Speckled Band.” But “Norwood Builder” has always been one of my favorites, and it’s because it marks, to me, a significant change in Holmes and Watson’s relationship. In ACD canon, the catalyst for this change is really the Return; “Norwood Builder” is the first story set and published after “The Empty House.” As I’ve said many times before, the stories in The Return of Sherlock Holmes show us a Holmes/Watson relationship which is much more intimate, and much more central to both of their lives, than in earlier volumes. Hawkesworth seems to have wanted the whole first series to have that Return vibe. Accordingly, in the Granada narrative, “Norwood Builder” takes place three episodes before “The Final Problem” (we have “Resident Patient” and “The Red-Headed League” coming up first). And thanks to some great work from the screenwriter and from Brett and Burke, this becomes, not just an interesting case, but a beautiful moment in the development of Holmes and Watson’s relationship.
BTW, in the discussion below I’m going to assume that Holmes and Watson are partners (in life as in the detective business) and that the show only left that coded because it was 1984-5. If that bothers you, bail now. (I imagine that anyone bothered by this has in fact already bailed; but you’ve been warned.)
I don’t think we talk about this shot enough. whoever was holding the camera, what were you thinking? I know nothing about cinematography, but this sure looks like these-two-in-a-relationship subtext going on
Continuing the Granada Holmes rewatch, we move to one of my favorites: “The Dancing Men.” This is one of the classic Holmes stories, and the best one about Holmes as code-breaker. It presents some challenges to the would-be adapter, because so much of the story is about Holmes solving the code, and it’s very difficult to dramatize that. But Anthony Skene, who wrote the teleplay, was an experienced hand at the mystery adaptation, and he does two really smart things here, one of which would have a major impact on adaptations to come. One, he spends a lot of time fleshing out the tragic story of Hilton Cubitt and his wife Elsie, showing her panic and deterioration and his (always almost-repressed, of course) emotional turmoil as the screw turns and the situation goes from bad to worse. Two, he turns this into a story about Holmes and Watson teaching each other. This hammers some nails in the coffins of the two biggest adaptation cliches that the Granada people were trying to kill: Unemotional Holmes and Stupid Watson.
I can’t with the Fourth of July this year, so I’m just gonna celebrate Watson Wednesday by posting about my very favorite screen Watson, David Burke.
I have affection and admiration for Hardwicke; I didn’t totally mind Jude Law; I’m sure there are other Watsons out there that I might love and just haven’t encountered. But today I feel like talking about why, when I started watching Granada Holmes as a youth back in the late 1980s, David Burke became The Watson for me.
We Granada fans talk about Jeremy Brett more, of course; but for me, the Brett-Burke pairing was so important to my love of the show that I stopped watching after he left. I’ve since gone back and done a complete rewatch, and I came to appreciate Hardwicke’s Watson for its own distinctive qualities. But there was just a kind of spark in Burke’s Watson that made everything lit (as the kids say). I’m glad we still have the work; I’m sad the man who made it is gone.
One of the finest and most beloved Watsons ever to grace the screen has passed away. David Burke was 91 years old, just shy of his 92nd birthday, and he is survived by his wife Anna Calder-Marshall and his son Tom Burke.
By all accounts, he was a gentleman and a wonderful human being. He could have stayed on to play Watson much longer, which would have made many of us very happy, but he chose to leave the show to be nearer to his family, especially since Tom was very young at the time.
His was not the first intelligent and competent Watson, but this version marked a turning point in mainstream depictions, from comedic sidekick to a hero in his own right.
RIP, dear sir. You will be missed. Thank you for everything.
Well this is a heartbreaker. His Watson has always been and will ever be my favorite Watson. I will also always remember the excitement of seeing him on stage in The Crucible.
It's my great pleasure to announce the release of Vonda N. McIntyre's final novel, The Curve of the World, from Aqueduct Press. It's available now from Aqueduct in both print and e-book editions. You can purchase it at https://www.aqueductpress.com
Publishing work posthumously, work that the author worked on until shortly before her death, is exciting but challenging, as I note in my foreword to the novel (included in the material below). Vonda bequeathed the rights to the novel to Clarion West, which has worked closely with Aqueduct to bring Vonda's novel into the world, particularly through the care and diligence of Nisi Shawl, who served in locus auctorae. Clarion West will be hosting a virtual launch of Curve of the World at 11 a.m. PDT on Saturday, May 16, featuring readings from the novel as well as discussion by Nisi Shawl, Debbie Notkin, and me about the novel and our collaborative editorial process. You can RSVP for the Zoom link here: https://www.clarionwest.org/event/the-curve-of-the-world-virtual-launch-event/.
Here is our description of the book:
This world is round. Loving sailors court its waves, bathe in sea
currents happily sharing secrets with them, waters telling them where
to go and how best to navigate their way. With persistence as gentle
and stubborn as worn stones, multiple award winner Vonda N. McIntyre
shows us versions of everyday Minoan activities based on common sense
and historical research, then flings us outward from that safe harbor
into the wildest of adventures. Monsters, volcanoes, pirates, mummy
kings--all these dangers must be passed as ambassador and former
bull-dancer Iakinthu travels thousands of miles on a mission to return
her foster son to his Pacific coast home.
Vonda treats the whole enterprise of bringing her last novel to life
with the calm assurance of a favorite aunt taking you shopping in the
best sex toy store ever. Sensory delights abound, from the soothing
oil massaged into bathers’ skins to the cool mountain breezes buoying
up ship-burdened balloons. The most audacious realities rise and ebb
beneath her steady yet unobtrusive attention. We readers of The Curve
of the World are truly fortunate to have such an elegant inevitability
of a story so beautifully unfolded here before us.
The Curve of the World is Vonda McIntyre's last gift to us, and
it is magnificent. In this alternate history of the ancient world, where
Minoans build a globe-spanning trading community, Vonda has taken up
the challenge of her good friend Ursula Le Guin and become a dreamer of a
wider reality, creating a glorious vision of a working world. The Curve
of the World is the sum and summit of all Vonda McIntyre was as a
writer and as a human being."
—Nicola Griffith, author of Ammonite and Hild
“Vonda takes us from the known world, a world with known dangers and
known comforts, into the unknown, the wild but civilized West. As she
herself looked ahead to the journey from life into death, she opens to
us a world filled with unrealized possibilities. This is a marvelous
book of the civilizations that could have been.”
—Eileen Gunn, author
of Stable Strategies for Middle Management
and Questionable Practices
“The Curve of the World is full of daring, and rich and rare invention,
but feeling true, as far as can be known, to the mysterious, apparently/
probably women-centered, ancient Minoan culture. I loved the giving of
beautiful gifts, between chance voyagers meeting on the ocean. So much
better than mere trade. A wonderful book.”
—Gwyneth Jones, author of Life and Bold as Love
“A vivid, luminous novel. As Minoan traders travel the ancient world,
McIntyre brings to richly imagined life six distinctive cultures of
antiquity, all touched with magic. The characters are so real that I
could see, feel, even smell them, and I passionately wanted each to
succeed at their various quests. The Curve Of The World is a
wonderful capstone to a storied career.”
—Nancy Kress, author of Observer
“I loved this book! It’s a glorious adventure with a heart as big as the
world! Iakinthu Gephyra is a diplomat, trader, explorer, and the ‘bridge
between people’ who strives to understand and accept cultures that are
not her own. To find the family of her adopted child, she sets forth on the
most difficult voyage her people have ever undertaken, sailing beyond the
Sunset Sea and across the Nameless Ocean. A fascinating exploration of
culture, family, and identity, about finding your way and discovering where
you belong.”
—Pat Murphy, author of The Adventures of Mary Darling
and The Wild Girls
Reviews
[An] epic journey plays out as a feminist odyssey
through six distinctive and mostly matriarchal cultures, superbly
constructed around permutations of myth and legend. McIntyre’s
scene-setting is lush and immersive, and her finely drawn, women-led
cast leaps off the page as they confront obstacles with wit and wisdom.
This sensitive and captivating voyage of discovery is a fitting capstone
to a remarkable career. (Read the whole review)
—Publishers Weekly, March, 2026
This book is Vonda
McIntyre’s last novel. She finished it just before she died, and it has
been lovingly crafted into publishable shape by her many friends....It
would have been great if Vonda had been able to live to see praise being
heaped upon the book, but praise it we shall anyway. (Read the whole review)
—Salon Futura, Cheryl Morgan, March 30, 2026
[A] magnificent achievement. I first read The Curve of the
World in three long sessions throughout one day. I could
not put it down (well, I had to eat), because Vonda’s slow,
deliberate worldbuilding is profoundly absorbing. Initially we
assume that Iakinthu inhabits a perfect utopia for women, but the
slow-burn hints about the repression of males in these cultures
make the narrative feel genuinely urgent: After all, the volcano
god is gendered male, and the cracks found each morning in the
buildings are getting larger with every subtle earth tremor.--Kate
Macdonald, Strange Horizons May 11, 2026 (read the whole review
here:
https://strangehorizons.com/wordpress/non-fiction/the-curve-of-the-world-by-vonda-n-mcintyre/)
Publisher's Note
The Curve of the World is Vonda N. McIntyre’s final novel. When she died in 2019, the manuscript was complete. Judging by the file name, the manuscript she left was in at least its fifth iteration. She bequeathed it to Clarion West, an organization dear to her heart, and Clarion West hired agent Jennie Goloboy to represent the novel; Aqueduct Press acquired it through her.
Not all readers will realize that the publication of a book involves more than simply printing copies of a manuscript accepted for publication. At every stage, the author engages in a collaborative process that aims to make the author’s work the best that it can be. And so, once Aqueduct decided to publish Vonda’s novel, we knew that we would need a writer to stand in loco Vondae to engage in that process. Clarion West hired the highly accomplished Nisi Shawl to do just that.
The collaborative process in bringing Curve into the world principally involved four people: Nisi Shawl, Debbie Notkin (whom Vonda wished to copy-edit her book), Kath Wilham, and me. Kath made the first pass, correcting obvious typos and marking the ms with queries in the margins anent variant spellings, inconsistencies, and occasional awkward diction. I then did a thorough line edit and raised more questions, the sort I would ask any author, some of which I knew would require judgment calls, and addressed Kath’s queries. Nisi then addressed my line-edits and our queries as well as adding new queries before sending the file back to me. Throughout, Nisi and I had numerous Zoom conversations to supplement the discussion taking place in the manuscript’s margins. When we’d resolved most of the issues raised in the queries, the file went to Debbie Notkin, who copy-edited the manuscript and contributed to the discussion in the margins as well as a few new queries. Nisi then addressed Debbie’s edits and comments, had another discussion with me on Zoom seeking to resolve the remaining unresolved queries, and sent the file on to Kath for typesetting.
Our concern throughout was to be as faithful as possible to Vonda’s intentions. Nisi’s constant goal was to preserve Vonda’s voice, while my primary concern was determining which stylistic prose habits in the ms were tics (i.e., scaffolding for the writing process that needed to be removed before publication), and which were intentional. This was particularly tricky for me because the narrative form and style of Curve mark a departure from the standard narrative forms and styles dominating fantasy and science fiction, which meant that some of those stylistic habits preoccupying me were likely intentional. All such calls ordinarily would be made through author-editor discussion.
The four of us have done our best to serve the novel as well as to preserve Vonda’s voice and intuit her intentions. This final work by Vonda is bold, confident, and innovative, helping us to imagine what humans from a spectrum of cultures can be to one another. It is my pleasure to be publishing it.
In the near(ish) future, a series of objects begin entering the solar system. They arrive one at a time, wait, and depart, but they are always, eventually, followed by another. They are a mystery; they are a sign of extra-terrestrial life; and they hold the promise of unlocking interstellar travel, if they can be understood. They are the titular zoi.
An obvious point of comparison is Arthur C. Clarke's classic Rendezvous with Rama (1973): Both novels center on the exploration of mysterious extra-solar entities with potentially massive ramifications for humanity. This, I suspect, is intentional. But Zoi takes this similar premise in a very different direction, and the comparison with Rama serves as much through contrast as by parallel, highlighting Zoi’s altogether more ambiguous understanding of humanity’s place in the universe.
Because the zoi are not massive, monolithic O’Neill cylinders with neat, human-habitable worlds on their inner surfaces. The zoi are living entities, similar—and entirely dissimilar—to giant, space-borne amoebae, replete with “organelles,” “cytosol fluid,” and “transparent membrane[s]” (p. 2). While they don’t respond to machines or conventional human means of communication—the investigation of the first zoi involves “a number of unmanned probes” but the zoi “never react[s] to their presence” (p. 15)—they do respond to humans. The first time an astronaut touches a zoi, the otherwise impenetrable surface “suck[s] inwards, leaving a cavity fit for the size of a human body” (p. 33), and the zoi subsequently repeats this when anyone draws near. When a later astronaut removes her glove inside a zoi and “[comes] into contact with the [interior] fluid,” the “liquid around them [is] punctured by bubbles which [grow] and [merge] into larger pockets of air” (pp. 63-64). These bubbles eventually form rooms filled with breathable atmosphere. In addition to being biological, the zoi demonstrate an active hospitality that makes them both more and less alien than Rama’s empty cylinder.
And, despite the grand implications of the premise, the focus of Zoi is both physically and emotionally intimate. It is the story of Amira, the novel’s narrator, told through two interwoven strands of narrative. In the present, she and three crewmates (Kiah, Evardo, and Linn) are inside a zoi as it departs the solar system. This is by choice, but it is a one-way trip: They have no control over the destination. They have all dedicated their lives to studying the zoi, and this is the final, ultimate dedication. But that doesn’t mean it will be easy. In the past, we learn of Amira’s life-long obsession with the zoi, starting with the arrival of the first when she was just a five-year-old “captivated by the sight of the shining lump between the stars” (p. 12), and growing into an unwavering drive to one day visit and study them, “no matter how long [that path] turned out to be” (p. 35). From the start of the novel, the reader knows she has succeeded, though not without sacrifice. The question of whether Amira knew what she was committing to—and if it was worth it—comes to the fore through this contrast between past and present.
The struggle, both psychological and biological, to adapt to spending the rest of their lives within the zoi affects each crewmate differently. For Amira, the reality is a far cry from the childhood dreams of discovery and friendship that led her to sacrifice so much in pursuit of her work. She reacts with fear and anger towards Kiah, with whom she was once close, due to the other’s “quick and efficient adaptation to the environment” (p. 9), and clings to Linn—eventually literally—whose body struggles to adapt, and whose “immune defense system seems to be especially hostile to the external influence” of the zoi (p. 7). Despite claiming to “have entered this with [her] eyes open” (p. 44), Amira is plainly uncomfortable with the implications of her choice: acceptance and adaptation to the zoi.
The crewmembers learn that while the zoi has altered itself to fit them, they in turn are being altered to fit it, and Amira laments the “blind, childish faith [she] used to have in the zois” (p. 54), and she and the others are gripped by mood swings and sickness, impulses and aversions, “powerful urge[s] to do specific things, and to avoid others” (p. 71). She is left struggling to determine which feelings are true and which false, which desires she must accept and which to fight. (Anyone who has experienced severe anxiety might sympathize.) The consequence is an experience of extreme—and eventually quite literal—self-alienation.
A more conventional narrative might question the zoi’s sinister motives, or focus entirely on the horror of an alien influence eroding our selfhood, autonomy, and bodily integrity. Yet Zoi suggests that the truth is more complicated. After all, if five-year-old Amira is naïve in her easy anthropomorphizing of a friendly zoi, “hurt because we never came up to see it” (p. 10), the adult Amira has gone to the opposite extreme in barely acknowledging the zoi’s status as a living being. She claims that the “zois aren’t sentient in any human sense of the word, but they react to stimuli with something resembling purposeful behavior” (p. 36)—unable to acknowledge even limited potential for agency without weighing it down with qualifiers. Moreover, the team are there to learn how to make the zoi produce human-model technology—“it should be possible to fabricate both components and entirely new devices out of materials synthesized from zoi substances” (pp. 21-22)—and to use it as a means of interstellar travel, for “the fulfilment of a dream […] for all of humanity” (p. 58). Amira arrives aboard as an archetypal explorer, ready to analyze and categorize and make the zoi useful—and she thereby reduces it to an object.
Her approach is very much in line with that of the mid-century sci-fi explorer seen in texts like Rendezvous with Rama. For all its vast scale and mystery, Rama is largely a passive backdrop on which humans act. Though the environment might be dangerous, it has no intent, and its dangers occur on a level directly tangible to human senses: the organic-robotic biots, the weather, the landscape. The great cylinder of Rama raises questions: Who built this, where are they, what are they like? But it fundamentally presupposes the existence of intelligent, tool-using, megastructure-building aliens that operate much like humans, albeit with far more advanced technology—“advanced” here presupposing technological development as a path of linear progress that humans might journey down. The line between explorer and explored is clear. There are active, intelligent beings, and there is the environment around them: a source of raw material to be shaped and used.
Zoi highlights the fundamental problem of positioning ourselves as external to the world we inhabit and privileging the incredibly narrow band of human perception and communication over the vastly larger and smaller scales on which the universe operates. The zoi that Amira inhabits may not speak or think like a human, but from the off it is clear it can distinguish between living beings and their tools, that it is learning about and responding to human biology. Though she knows of the hormone-altering effect, and chooses to stay, Amira is not prepared for the reciprocity this entails. She is horrified when Kiah points out that “air-filled spaces aren’t natural for the zoi” and that “they could be harmful to it in the long run” (p. 44). While assuming the conditions amenable to her are a given, she is deeply discomforted by any suggestion of human accommodation to the zoi’s needs. Again, it is significant that she comes into conflict with Kiah, who adapts easily, but embraces Linn, who struggles on a fundamental, biological level. Moreover, Kiah’s original task, as psychologist, was “studying the zoi from a psychological and communicative perspective” (p. 36), a role acknowledging its capacity for reciprocal exchange. By contrast, Linn’s intended role as the biotech expert was to find ways to use the zoi to produce human technology: the zoi as exploitable object/environment.
Why should it surprise us that a biological entity might communicate on the level of hormonal alterations or cellular interactions, a far more universal language even on our own planet, rather than human speech? Why are human attempts to adapt the zoi to our needs any less or more horrifying than the inverse? Can we really separate ourselves so easily from the biological environments in which we exist, and without which the human body cannot survive? These are the kinds of questions Zoi raises.
It does this while operating on a relatively intimate scale. The zoi are large but not vast, their interior comprising a handful of rooms. Aboard are only four characters, including Amira, and contact with those remaining on Earth is limited—the novel opens on a message from Earth, with which it is no longer possible to have real-time communication. The focus here is on the relationships and tensions between Amira and the others. But even in the sections on Earth, the focus remains constrained. Most of Amira’s life is covered in a small span of text, and the story is largely that of two key relationships. The first is Amira’s friendship with her uncle, Karim, an idealist who encourages her dreams of reaching the zoi. The second is Amira’s relationship with Natan, her lover, partner, and friend—a relationship that, from the very first page, we know Amira ultimately chooses to leave behind, allowing Natan to pursue his dreams of family life and Amira to commit herself entirely to study of the zoi. There are indications of a wider world, then—one with changed sexual/familial norms, social structures, and environmental conditions—but broad worldbuilding isn’t the focus here.
Combined with the sometimes-sparse descriptive prose—see, for example, “I move through the entrance and continue down the passageways, towards the room designed for disposing of bodily waste” (p. 20)—the small setting and cast can lend the novel the air of a stage-play, the centrality of the narrator’s subjective experience notwithstanding. It is always clear what is happening and where, and the writing keeps up the pace, with even exposition whipping by. There is no lingering on visceral detail or, for that matter, linguistic flourish. Though the novel is deeply engaged with concepts from biology, this is not diamond-hard SF with Peter Watts-style hyper-technicality (nor is it half so bleak). The zoi’s impenetrable surface, its rapid adaptation to human needs, and its ability to travel between the stars are all left as simple fact. Concept and character are king.
The novel keeps the pages turning without the need for gun-battles, the mystery of what will happen next pulls the reader along (it only gets weirder), and the character drama is compelling without ever straying into the melodramatic. These are people in an inconceivably stressful situation, but they are also intelligent adults doing their best, and, whatever her flaws, Amira is ultimately sympathetic. Her dread and panic are all too relatable, trapped within an alien being by her own choice and grappling with existential questions as her body and mind change around her, her lifelong dream now revealed a nightmare.
Though biologists and hard SF fans might find it lacks the level of technical detail they’d like, anyone interested in SF that focuses on authentic reactions to encounters with the alien will find Zoi worth a read. It manages a novel take on the age-old premise of first contact. Here is a story of scientific exploration and personal transformation, emphasizing the sometimes-unsettling implications of our biological nature, our interdependence with environments and organisms we all too often fail not consider, and the compromises that even friendly contact with an alien lifeform would entail.
The summary is: I’m glad it didn’t end with Season 2. Still enjoying Tennant and Sheen, whose chemistry can sublimate anything into gold.
As for the rest…
I have to say I didn’t much care for it.
And one of the things that I didn’t care for about it is that most of it doesn’t really follow from Season 2. I mean there are threads that are picked up–Michael being a double agent, etc.–but the plot felt very generic, and the conclusion…well, it’s the ending of The Good Place, it’s the ending of The Umbrella Academy, and honestly I think I’m partly mad about the fact that it just seems like a way of avoiding the work of writing an actual resolution. There’s something…kind of…Moffaty about it. Moffaty as in: Big stakes! Massive conflict! The universe ends! Our beloved characters, tragically destroyed forever! But PSYCH! The universe is BACK! MIRACLE HAPPY ENDING!!!
Because the thing is, the end of Season 2 set us up for so many stories that could have been so cool. And this really isn’t any of them. The Metatron, who clearly came out of Season 2 as the main villain, is just poofed out of existence in the cheesiest…I mean, the victim looking into the camera and saying, “YOU!” right before being murdered is one of the dumber cliches to emerge from decades of Agatha Christie TV adaptations. Hell has basically nothing to do at all in this episode–though I did enjoy Aziraphale’s trip down there–and in most of the Heaven scenes very little happens. Even the callbacks they obviously worked on, like the whole 3-card monte thing, seem oddly disconnected from what they’re referring to. The whole gangster plot with the Bentley was more compelling than the main plot, again partly because it wasn’t really about what it said it was about. It turned out not to matter at all where Jesus was, really.
I had assumed, given that they had to shove the whole 3rd season into one 90 minute episode, that it would be jam-packed with action, intrigue, adventure…and instead it felt slow and empty. Like, I feel like we got YEARS of Muriel Being Dim. Which would be OK if it was going somewhere…but it wasn’t really. Poor Muriel works out that Michael has the book, and it doesn’t matter. If Crowley’s always known that Michael has the book, why hasn’t he done anything about it?
I mean…many of you all know, I’m not totally adverse to The Characters Meet The Creator And Ask Her Questions. But…I don’t know. The S3 portrayal of God didn’t seem to me to be connected to S1 and S2. And…
OK, I guess this is a philosophical peeve, I suppose, but…
The new godless universe. I do not buy it. There is no such thing as a world with humans but no angels or demons. Once humans come into the picture, they invent angels and demons and gods in all shapes and sizes. If this is a universe that doesn’t have those concepts it’s only because the humans have been artificially prevented from arriving at them, which means that God is still out there somewhere fucking with them. And if it doesn’t have those concepts…then what’s in Asa’s shop, apart from those astrophysics books? In this universe, is there Paradise Lost? Was there ever an Iliad? I suppose not? Was there ever Romanticism? What do poets write about in this universe? What is love like in a world where there’s no divine love to which it can be analogized?
I mean all of these questions COULD be answered, that would be kind of an interesting thought experiment…but they AREN’T, and this is my problem. The writers are really not committed to this idea, except as a way of wrapping up the arc and giving New Crowley and New Aziraphale their fluff ending.
Again. Not opposed to fluff. The whole thing with the bookshop and Crowley having written that book that no one ever buys…all that’s very sweet, I enjoyed watching them do it, I enjoyed all the scenes with them together. I just wish they could have built a better structure around them, and I wish that they hadn’t given us a reset instead of a resolution.
Ah well. I will be grateful for it later, I suppose, once I’m over the disappointment. But right now I feel like the curse of Neil Gaiman blighted this whole project sort of beyond repair. Which is sad. I mean, yes, nice homage to Terry Pratchett with the portrait sequence and all, but…this season doesn’t feel like something people really genuinely loved. At least, I don’t think I’m ever gonna love it.
It can be hard to have solid opinions and identities when we live in a world of mixed messages and misinformation. With propaganda running rampant, how can we be sure if reality is really real? Author Thomas Elrod plays with this idea of a false reality in his newest novel, The Franchise. Tune in to his Big Idea to see how one man’s fiction may be another man’s reality.
THOMAS ELROD:
I think we are all a little fatigued by the long-running IP franchises on TV and in movies. Sure, we all had a good time watching Harrison Ford return as Han Solo or were happy to see Captain America wield Thor’s hammer, but lately? Eh? It all feels tired, as long-running franchises often do. Good thing Hollywood has plenty of other films and shows in development and we can look forward to some fresh stories in the coming years…
Okay, so there’s the rub. It certainly feels like not only will our big cultural mega-franchises not be retired, it is as if they can’t be. Too much of the shareholder value of Disney or Warner Brothers or Netflix is wrapped up in these very expensive properties for these very large corporations (always merging together into even larger corporations) to ever stop. They can’t. They have to continue generating revenue and growth.
What happens to culture if it can never stop recycling itself?
My big idea was this. I wanted to imagine a film franchise that just kept on going forever, kept expanding and looking for new ways to juice the IP. I was partially inspired by the failed Star Wars hotel, which tried to create an immersive storytelling experience for guests in Disney World, but which was too expensive and wonky. However, it’s not hard to see how Disney was using that experience to commodify LARPing and cosplay and other fan activities into something they could monetize and turn into content.
So I did the thing Science Fiction writers do and I extrapolated, imagining a Truman Show-esque environment where a film studio sets up a living set of a popular fantasy film franchise and populates it with people who have had their memories changed to believe they are real characters in this world. Plots are put into motion, writers and actors are hired to push the story along, and everything is secretly filmed. It’s pitched to fans as a limited-time experience, where you can sign up to have your memory temporarily altered so you can live in this world you love so much. Surely, nothing will go wrong!
The challenge as a writer is how to sustain this concept for the course of an entire novel and also how to build a real story out of it. This is always the problem with high-concept ideas. It’s one thing to come up with a hook, it’s another to create interesting characters and engage them in the twists and turns of an effective story that doesn’t become repetitive.
For me, the thing I held onto was the larger “What if” that this concept suggests, which isn’t just about intellectual property in Hollywood but about one’s identity in a world of misinformation. We all live in a kind of constructed reality, whether we know it or not, based on our sources of news, social media, entertainment, etc. We all know people who seem to live and exist in a totally different conception of the world than our own, and this is both baffling and frustrating. But we still have agency over our own lives, and if we want to spend our energy on, say, denying the efficacy of vaccines or insisting a fair election was rigged, to what extent does a person need to take responsibility for those opinions and to what extent is it possible (or ethical) to blame their misinformation reality on their beliefs?
This is a thornier question but also one which provided a way into the story, which very early on I knew was going to include many different character POVs, some from people who play a minor role in the actual plot but whose perspective ends up being different or interesting. Since some people in the story know what is really going on, some have partial information or suspect something, and some have their own views on what is happening despite possibly knowing what is “real,” the great gift of interior and perspective that fiction affords was my way to start building characters and story. My book would be about this confluence of perspectives, and what happens when they clash into one another.
Along the way there was lots of opportunity for light satire about Hollywood, deconstruction of modern fantasy storytelling, and a lot else, but being able to marry theme and structure was the key to making sure my Big Idea, my book’s hook, actually worked and remained interesting over 350 pages. It ended up being a blast to write, so I hope that comes across to everyone else and that they have just as good a time reading it.
Athena started the bloomposting yesterday and here is my contribution: the irises in our front yard, which are in their annual two-week period of blooming, followed by 50 weeks of just being green shrubs. Still, for those two weeks, it’s pretty great to look at.
I of course can take no credit for these irises. Krissy planted them several years ago and tends to them annually; I just go out and take pictures of them when they’ve all popped. Still, I flatter myself that I take some fairly decent pictures of them. And then you get to appreciate them as well! So, please do.
This concludes our bloomposting for today, now back to our regularly scheduled programming.
Honestly, have we become entirely blase about walruses frolicking in British territorial waters? Because this was the first I had heard about Magnus, who has been making quite the tour of Scotland for the past month before wafting off to Noroway o'er the faem: Magnus the wandering walrus leaves Scotland for Norway.
Choughs are considered Cornwall’s “national bird” and feature in its coat of arms but vanished as a resident from the far south-west of the UK in the early 1970s, largely because of the decline of their grazed clifftop habitat. Their disappearance was keenly felt across Cornwall but particularly, perhaps, in and around Tintagel because of the bird’s connections to the legend of King Arthur.
Is this A Sign for Cornish Nationalism? Or does it precurse The Return of Arthur?
The bridge itself is a floating patch of nature reserve; its contents were excavated and transplanted from the heathland on either side. Heather, the tough wiry shrub that defines heathland, is already springing up in purples and yellows above the A3’s roar, supporting the area’s insects and reptiles. “They can feed here, get cover, they can bask, they can breed,” says Herd. Ground-nesting birds, such as nightjars, woodlarks and Dartford warblers, will also benefit from the newly connected landscape.
One stretch of the Highline has been completed as part of the Coal Drops Yard development, involving a bridge across the Regent’s canal from the Camley Street nature reserve that transforms into a landscaped walkway popular with office workers and tourists.
even if the full Camden Town to King's Cross plan is defunct?
We’ve all got a beast inside us, waiting to be unleashed. For some, they never hold it back. For others, they keep it caged until it can be repressed no longer. Enter author Sam Beckbessinger, whose fury led to the creation of her newest novel, Femme Feral.
SAM BECKBESSINGER:
My new novel Femme Feral didn’t grow out of a Big Idea so much as an emotion, or rather, the lack of one.
About a decade ago I was walking around Cape Town on my way to a friend’s birthday. It was one of those perfect picnic-dress days, a spring-in-your-step song-in-your-heart kind of summer afternoon. Then I realised some dude was following me. I did the things all women do. Reached into my handbag and clutched my keys. Scanned for easy exit routes or an open shop I could dash into. Sped up my walk, but not too much, because you don’t want to over-react or trigger his prey drive. This wasn’t the first time I’d been followed, obviously, but something about this time was different. I wasn’t only afraid, I was furious. I’d been having a lovely day until this creep ruined it! And I found myself having a fantasy I’d never had before: that I could reach into my bag and pull out a gun, turn to him, and make him feel afraid.
This was a shock. I’ve never been an angry person. I hate guns and I loathe violence. So much so, I’ve wondered before whether something was wrong with me. Spend time with any toddler and you’ll see that fury’s a foundational human emotion, yet it’s one I’ve barely ever felt. I’ve been a lifelong good girl, empathetic, nurturing, forgiving – sometimes to my detriment. I started to wonder, what happens to feelings you never feel? Are they still there somewhere inside of you, hidden, waiting? Do they mutate? And when they do finally come roaring out, will they be uglier for having been locked away for so long?
Femme Feral grew out of those questions. It’s the story of a hypercompetent tech executive in her forties who thinks she’s going through perimenopause, but she’s actually turning into a werewolf. She doesn’t realise it, but once a month, she transforms into a violent beast who savagely mauls everyone who pisses her off in her waking life. The problem is, sometimes it’s the people you love who hurt you the most. Oh, also, there’s an obsessive monster-hunter on her trail – an eighty-four year old vigilante named Brenda who’s trying to find the creature that killed her cat.
The perimenopause part was fun to write, because that’s a joke about how the medical industry still somehow, in 2026, knows about as much about perimenopause as it knows about lycanthropy. When I wrote it, I was myself approaching forty, seeing the first signs of my own oncoming werewolf era (perimenopause usually begins earlier than most people think!). I can’t tell you how many of my friends I’ve seen go to the doctor to get help for a range of confusing midlife symptoms and instead of being given any actual help, the doctor suggests maybe they should try losing some weight.
But the gorgeous thing about midlife is that it’s also – for many of us – the age our lifelong coping strategies begin to fail, and we’re forced to reckon with everything we’ve been repressing. Anger is an unacceptable emotion in women, so many of us repress it or transform it into something else. The beautiful thing about midlife, for many of us, is that our bodies no longer allow us to do that. Some of us have quite exciting breakdowns that lead to healthy realisations and overdue dramatic life changes; some of us lure our toxic bosses into an alleyway and rip their intestines out. Whatever a girl’s got to do.
This is exactly what I love so much about horror: how it allows you to speak the language of metaphor and play with our most primal emotions. It amuses me, too, that the werewolf is one of the most stubbornly masculine of monsters in our culture because we still find it impossible to imagine women as uncontrollably violent (there are some glorious exceptions, of course, from Ginger Snaps to Alan Moore’s “The Curse” to Rachel Yoder’s Nightbitch).
Unlike my previous novel Girls of Little Hope, which I co-wrote with my friend Dale Halvorsen and which we carefully planned and outlined before writing a word of prose, the first draft of Femme Feral came out of me in a hot stinking vomit (almost like … it had been curdling inside of me all this time). The first draft was a half-formed hideous thing, which I then spent several years pulling into the shape of a novel. Many spreadsheets were involved, since control is my coping mechanism of choice.
I had a blast taking a wild premise and then trying to work through the consequences very seriously. If you could rip someone’s head off, whose head would tempt you first? What would an NHS GP say if you told him that once a month you find yourself naked and covered in blood on the other side of town with no memory of how you got there? And the question that probably vexed me more than any other (and John Landis never had to deal with): how the heck is this beast roaming all around modern London without being spotted by CCTV?
The process of writing this story was deeply therapeutic for me. I’m not sure I’ve fully worked out exactly what I think about anger, but a novel’s not a polemic so it doesn’t require you to have an argument. It only requires you to have some questions, and then to get in touch with the parts of yourself that might be asking them. In my case, that was a furious beast I had been telling myself wasn’t even there.
Read Jonathan Coe, Bournville (2022), which was a Kobo deal, and I have been vaguely interested in reading something by him since coming across his really rather good intro to that archetypal Sad Girl Novel, Dusty Answer. However, was rather meh and tempted at points to give up on this family saga from VE Day to Covid told as vignettes at various Memorable Dates in History of C20th Britain.
There was a certain amount of picking things up and reading a bit and thinking, no, at least, not now, if ever.
Re-read Sally Smith, A Case of Life and Limb (The Trials of Gabriel Ward, #2) (2025), as there is another one forthcoming shortly.
Kobo deals turned up a new Simon R Green, For Better or Murder (Holy Terrors Mystery #4), alas, this was pretty much phoning it in.
Muriel Spark, The Hothouse by the East River (1973), which is a very very weird novella, absurdist, grotesque, is it about something that happened when they were working for Secret Organisation with German POWs in War and is that why the unheimlich frisson (turns out, no).
After that I just wanted the perhaps too simple and predictable pleasures of Robert B Parker, Silent Night (Spenser #41.5) (2013, unfinished at his death, completed by his agent Helen Brann).
On the go
Persuasion, which I began somewhat behindhand of the daily chapter group read on bluesky.
Up next
Well, there's that new Literary Review, but apart from that.
Am being irked by certain writers whose new ebooks are pretty 2x or more what they used to be. (I might have gone for this I suppose had I not been a bit underwhelmed by some recent offerings.)
The other day on Facebook I read a post that was a repost of an earlier conversation from Tumblr (I'm sure you've all seen this sort of thing). Anyway, the topic was a discussion of whether or not a vampire policeman (a la Forever Knight) could use a judicial warrant to force you could grant them permission to enter your house. The discussion seemed to divide into two camps:
Yes, they can.
No, they can't, because the permission forced from you by the warrant is not a true expression of your will.
Recently I've been reading Seanan McGuire's October Daye series (highly recommend, if you haven't read them), which contain a lot of this sort of verbal jiggery-pokery tied into the magic system. This got me to thinking further about the vampire policeman problem and how, as the person in the house, it seems like there's got to be some combination of words that you can say which will simultaneously keep you out of trouble with human law (by honoring the validity of the warrant) while at the same time protecting yourself from the vampire (by indicating to the vampire that you do not freely give permission for them to enter your house), and which further could be stated in such a way that a bystander who is not aware of the existence of vampires/fairies/etc. would not find anything amiss in what you said. I was mulling this over while doing some chores and listening to some music when the Grateful Dead's "Trucking" came on and (in my opinion) handed me the answer on a silver platter[^1]: "If you've got a warrant, I guess you're gonna come in." It simultaneously acknowledges that the warrant grants the power of entry and fails to grant your open personal permission to enter.
[^1] Upon writing it here, I'm wondering if "on a silver platter" has any relevance to faerie. Expect a post on that in the future.
A clang for the King, clang for the Queen, three clangs for the sisters never to be seen. A clang for the orchard, a clang for the sea, three clangs for the suitors who lie in a dream. A clang for the curse, clang for the quest, And one last for the crow who sings in its nest.
A bell tolls thirteen times at midnight aboard a train that changes its appearance at will. It bears a travelling ballet troupe (and the all-seeing, all-knowing, all-controlling Crow); each morning, the train brings them to a new location somewhere in Britain, where their different-but-same theatre (a character likens it to the ship of Theseus) has turned up dutifully and on time. The troupe only ever present one ballet: “The Apple and the Pearl.” Their audience? The fae.
It is thought that the enigmatic Crow’s singing is what lures performers and support crew alike “out” of the world to take part in this particular production. Yet it somehow—rather sensibly—attracts only those who are already acquainted with the workings of other worlds (or, as with a few of the crew, people with much stronger, closer ties). Even then, it is only the cast and crew’s pledge to the Crow (each one for a year and a day), and their adhering to the rules of curfew, that protects them from being snatched.
On the chilly, foggy morning of All Souls’ Day, the Grub (which is what they call their train, the “maggot in the fruit”) has brought them just outside of a graveyard—beyond which, at the end of a cobbled avenue in between the graves, is the Grit (that is, the theatre, “the speck of dirt that gets trapped in the oyster shell”). Today, it is a looming shadow, “spiky and threatening like a haunted house from a horror film.”
Rym Kechacha’s ambitious new novel is far from spiky and threatening, but it is darkly haunting, both in the atmosphere that envelops the reader from its opening line and in the themes its character-centric ensemble story tackles. Over the course of twenty-four hours narrated in fluid and vivid present-tense prose, we follow different characters among the performers and support crew as they prepare for that night’s show. The third-person point of view glides between each chosen member, guided sometimes by an omniscient narration, returning once or twice to the same characters later in the day. In this way we’re privy to different perspectives of the same person, creating links between these intimate, rich, but all-too-brief portraits.
This is a troupe of “misfits and mavericks,” of “vagabonds and wanderers,” of the ones with something missing. From the tour manager to the cook to the wardrobe mistress to the ballet director; to the set manager to the musicians in the orchestra and the dancers; newbies and old-timers alike yearn for one thing or another while loss, regrets, and ghosts trail them just as much as love, passion, and creation.
Some among them love the solace of a well-creased routine (“there is a comfort in life here, a certainty to the flow of each day”); for others, it is their only chance to perform at the top edge of their talents and to a captivated audience, never mind the risks involved; for many, it’s the sense of community—“if he is mad then here, at last, are people as mad as him.” But there are also those who question their purpose, who wonder, “What do we make here; what do we create, what do we leave behind us?” Upon either not finding any answer or only unsatisfactory ones, these latter kind return to the real world at the end of their pledge.
One of the most compelling perspectives is that of Mara, one of the senior dancers performing the Queen’s role on the night of the novel, who, as we follow her through rehearsal, wonders what she’ll do with the rest of her life if she decides not to renew her pledge. She already misses the “life-raft” ritual of daily ballet class even as she’s being led through the motions by their director, and contemplates her identity as a ballet dancer—and the glittering, toxic nature of the industry (Kechacha herself is a classically trained dancer, so the perspective and the critiques ring true).
Why would anyone pour blood, sweat, tears, even their selfhood, into something that is over in the blink of an eye—“A daylily blooming for just one day before withering [...] that’s all of them. That’s ballet”—just as they’ve become the best they’ve ever been?
Mara navigates her thoughts about the push-pull of this “strange, diamantine thing made of equal parts cruelty and beauty,” at whose altar they all have to sacrifice and kneel, punish themselves, and grovel. All this is of course in pursuit of an unattainable ideal that “doesn’t live in this realm.” Indeed, this is why, another character explains, the fae are called to the ballet like dangerous moths to an intoxicating flame. They are drawn to “the beauty of human bodies striving and yearning for that ideal” and want to, according to Mara, “sip at the space between pain and beauty.”
There are many such gaps throughout the narrative: the space between the dancer and the dance, between who you want to be and are, the perfection you wish to attain and the unforgivably imperfect nature of being human; the “border space” between being hidden in the blackness and being bared, exposed for all the audience to see; the veil between the human and fae worlds, and the one that’s almost always there—and not to its detriment, as it really works for the novel—between the reader and the narrative.
There are those among the troupe who understand, even embrace, that some things are not for us to know. As the lighting director, shadowed by a potential new lighting assistant on her first day, at the end of which she’ll decide whether to make her first pledge, tells her very early on in the story: If she thinks too hard about it, it’ll “trip” her over. “There’s a point where you have to accept it or go home,” he says. “All shows have quirks, this one just has a few more than most.” The advice also feels applicable to a reader on this journey with them, even as another character ponders how on earth to describe the reality—the unreality—of “The Apple and the Pearl” to anyone.
Mara’s section continues throughout to feel the closest to a fully drawn portrait while also binding together larger narrative concerns about the cost and the reward of art, its beauty and brutality—and its many different whys, especially in the context of this ballet, for not just those on stage, but also the ones behind the scenes making it all possible. In particular, we search for reasons why they all choose to stay in this liminal but communal existence, pledge after pledge, despite the otherworldly danger.
Speaking of danger: Don’t go into this novel expecting it to feature the fae as prominent characters, because they’re more mentioned and alluded to than seen. They are an invisible but constantly lurking presence which manifests in the form of an all-suffusing unease, far more potent perhaps because we read through so much of the rather mundane, terribly human problems and thoughts occupying those on board the Grub. This serves as a reminder of the sharp, serrated lines of the bubble within which the troupe have cocooned themselves, and mingles with the heightened sense of anticipation that is impossible to ignore as showtime nears.
Where is this all headed, you wonder. What’s the game here, the intention behind the telling. After all, even a story as thin on plot as this one needs some form of culmination. And in this endeavour, the climax of the ballet combines with what I’d argue is the climax of the entire narrative. It is probably the story’s most mystical and magical scene, and possibly its most overtly macabre, a spectacle that makes all eerily clear: the purpose of the ballet, why only that particular ballet and never another, just how much the Crow is not only the conduit between realms but also the one holding the troupe and the different threads of this story together.
When it is all over and there remains nothing and nobody in that space where there’s only illusion, we return with the characters to their routines, the many steps that follow the end of show, the curfew before the warning tolls. Because tomorrow arrives as tomorrow always does, heralded by thirteen bells starting at the stroke of midnight in a fast-moving train bearing you to your next destination.
Today Charlie and George are seven years old. A prime birthday for kitties very much approaching their prime. Compared to the tiny little rescue beasties we first met they are monstrously large, magnificently mighty, and hugely handsome. Biased? Not at all!
I’ve posted many (many!) photos of these two over the years (for some examples, go read previous Kitten Reports, or just search under Charlie and George, or go read my Instagram or Bluesky accounts—more Charlie and George pictures than anyone (except their besotted staff) could possibly want).
So today I’ve gathered up a selection of my sketches, starting with my very first attempts—when I got my very first iPad with Pencil. They seemed as good a subject as any to experiment with. How old are they here? Honestly, I don’t know, but I’m guessing about two.
After a couple of weeks I got a bit better, figuring out how to (sort of) use (some) brushes on Procreate. This was when I discovered that Charlie had a gift I had hoped to never encounter again: the Paw of Permanent Delete. Two decades ago, this was a gift his forebear, Zack, had—with audio files. I’d spend an hour perfecting a reading from, say, Stay, only for Zack to trundle across the keyboard and just…erase everything. I don’t mean ‘erase to the most recent backup’, I mean make it unexist, as though I’d lived an hour in another universe. It was only ever audio files; never text or images. Sadly for me, Charlie has that gift—though only with Photoshop, and only on my iPad. Thankfully, at some point and some software update, his Paw was rendered inactive.
(Ah. He just opened his eyes, gave me a lazy yawn, a knowing blink, and a look that clearly said, That’s what you think…)
Anyway, after several traumatic days of work loss, I set my iPad and Pencil aside for a while—until I started working hard on maps for Menewood. But for whatever reason he wasn’t keen on those, so they (mostly) stayed safe.
But about a year ago I started to experiment with I call my Zoomorphics—copying and/or adapting the beautiful animal imagery of Early Medieval Britain, sometimes from their jewellery, sometimes from sculpture, and sometimes from il.uminated manuscripts, most often the Lindisfarne Gospels and the Book of Kells.
I never liked the Early Medieval versions of cats (see this one, or this one) so I decided to try my hand at Charlie and George, seventh-century style. In case you can’t really tell which is which—I don’t blame you!—on the left is eorge curled up asleep with his eyes open, and on the right Charlie crouched to pounce on a catnip mouse.
Those feel a bit, well, jazzy to me (not to mention that George’s hindquarters look disconcertingly like a large ham)—though I have to say the picture of Charlie does capture some of that coiled-to-spring energy that is such a part of him.
Anyway, it was at this point that I started to really focus on how to adapt realistic-looking animal poses to Early Medieval artistic styles—and now I’m talking specifically a) the Lindisfarne Gospels (whose scribe had a wonderfully fluid style that I admire enormously—s/he was particularly gifted when it comes to animal heads: see, for example, George’s head above, and then a bit further down; lifted whole cloth from Lindisfarne) and b) the early pre-Christian Pictish Stones. The Pictish carvers could do realism quite well—but only if that animal was very statically posed. I had to learn make a lot of mistakes before I could figure out how to adapt a blend of Lindisfarne and Pictish styles to start to create my own.
Here’s a purely Lindisfarne image of a young—six months old, maybe—George just waking from one of those sudden kittenish naps, and here’s Charlie, taken from a photo last year, at the height of his summer weight and muscle, looking more like a 90-lb cougar than a 9-lb tabby. There’s something about Charlie facial expressions that make him much harder to draw in adapted medieval style; even that wonderful Lindisfarne scribe couldn’t catch our beastie’s Resting Demon Face.
And, just for a change, here’s a picture of George when he’s not asleep, or just waking up. This is from a photo taken a year or two ago of him stalking a leaf. And here is Charlie looking sweet as pie, as though butter wouldn’t melt in his mouth. I forget what photo I used as a reference for this, though honestly it’s such a typical pose for him it could have been on of scores.
In the end what I’m trying to get at isi that Charlie and George are both now fully themselves. Their personalities have found their permanent form. That doesn’t mean they’re not growing and changing—they learn, absorb, and adapt all the time—but that they are distinct, and only growing more so as they gather experience and shape it around them.
George is still our kitty engineer—studying things carefully to work out the parameters and mechanism of action before engaging; after all, life is good and risk exists to be reduced to ensure continuing success. Charlie is still our, What’s that? Charge! knight in shining fur who will assume he is big enough to tackle anything and, after all, the world is his plaything.
They are both, of course, right. Kelley and I are honoured to host their magnificence and serve their needs as long as they’ll let us. We hope it will be many, many more years.
Spring is in full swing here in Ohio and it has been both very beautiful and very allergy-inducing. One of the more beautiful aspects is that there is apparently a ton of American Wisteria wrapped around my pergola by the garage, and I find it to be extremely pretty. See for yourself:
This particular bloom is more open and blossomed than the others, hence why I took its photo. Before they bloomed, they all looked like tiny purple pinecones. I had no idea that they would open up into these beautiful flower clusters. I’m absolutely thrilled these are wrapped completely around my pergola. I notice their beauty every time I leave my house.
Very grateful to have some pretty purple flowers around.
Have you seen American Wisteria before? Perhaps you’ve seen the wisteria in Japan before? Let me know in the comments, and have a great day!
(Mix and shake that metaphor and pour it over ice and serve it up with a wee paper umbrella!)
Somebody today on Another Site was mourning the Old Days on LJ which made me think of:
All the various Old Days in my life on and offline which were by their nature transient -
- but that transient didn't mean that they didn't have lasting effects/influence.
(I will spare dr rdrz accounts of various short-lived initiatives I encountered among the archives and in the course of Mi Researchez which nonetheless echoed down the years.)
Also that even had things not fallen out the way things did with LJ (hiss, boo, etc) by now it would almost certainly not be the same experience as it was in the 00s - people would have come, people would have gone, our interests and energies would have changed....
So we would probably be nostalgically regetting the glory days before [whenever].
When it comes down to it, all humanity really has at the end of the day is our stories. Telling stories around the fire is a tale as old as humans themselves, and author Ada Hoffman expresses the importance of these stories, and the importance of being human, in the Big Idea for their newest novel, Ignore All Previous Instructions.
ADA HOFFMAN:
When I tell people the premise of Ignore All Previous Instructions, they often remark how it reminds them of real life these days. In Ignore, the characters live in a space colony on Callisto where a generative AI company owns everything – and where making art or telling stories, without the AI’s assistance, is strictly not allowed.
Certainly there are parallels between this dystopian premise and my life in 2026 – working as an adjunct for a university computer science department where the people in charge keep yelling about the “pivot to AI” and how terrible it will be if we don’t all get on board.
But I wrote Ignore in 2023.
Publishing is slow, and novelists write about current events at our own peril. In 2023, I could see which way the tech industry hype train was going, but there was no way to know if it would still be going that direction three years later. I hoped it wouldn’t be. I decided to write the story anyway and see how it landed, because the topic was so close to my professional expertise and so close to my heart.
Another part of the novel, even closer to my heart and equally timely, was the problem of queer self-expression and book bans.
In 2023, I was at an early stage in therapy. I was just starting to think back, in ways I hadn’t allowed myself before, about how some of my experiences growing up had shaped me. This included a lot of things, many of them not germane to this post, but it also included the experience of growing up queer without understanding that that’s what it was.
My gut told me that I needed to write about these experiences – more urgently than I had ever needed to write about anything before.
In 2023, we were already seeing book bans and “Don’t Say Gay” laws. I didn’t know if that trend was going to continue for three years, either. I hoped it wouldn’t. But I couldn’t help but look at that news and think of my own childhood. I eventually did find words and concepts for what I was experiencing, although not necessarily in the healthiest way. The generation after me was given so much more, in terms of words and ways of understanding themselves. It galled me to see reactionaries trying to take that away from them again.
When I put these two urgently emerging problems together, I could see that they had one big thing in common. They were both, at heart, about the deep human need to express one’s own feelings – and a powerful movement that threatened to take it away.
AI writing is not an expression of the genuine heartfelt thought or experience of a human. If it is carefully prompted to express a human’s heartfelt thought, then the thought comes from the human, not the AI. Research shows that, the longer we use a generative AI, the less our own thoughts enter into it; instead, offloading our thinking onto an AI causes our own capacity for independent thought to atrophy. Given the fervor and urgency with which tech companies urge us to use AI for everything, one might be forgiven for suspecting that this atrophy is their goal.
Moreover, because it’s trained to predict the most likely continuation of a set of words, AI writing will always converge toward the most mainstream or most common way of looking at something. The mainstream of the training data – essentially, the whole Internet, plus all the published books that the tech companies could find – is not queer. Even without any deliberate censorship, the perspectives of queer people and other minoritized groups are less likely to be considered in an AI’s output. For the same reason, if the AI is deliberately prompted to represent a queer perspective, it will rely on broad averages and stereotypes – not the lived and felt experience of an individual human who is queer.
But in hard times like these, independent thought based on our own lived experience is exactly what we need. This is the skill that helps us to understand when something is not quite right, or doesn’t quite match the truth of our lives – whether it’s a structural injustice or something personal.
Ignore All Previous Instructions tells the story of characters who grow up caught in a system where their own thoughts and voices are not valued, and who find ways – determinedly and imperfectly – to tell their own stories regardless. If there’s one idea readers take away from the book, I hope it’s the beauty and power of storytelling in our own words – and the need to hold on to it in the face of an establishment which would rather our stories weren’t told.
The fare is $3. If you commute, you take the bus or train twice a day, five days a week. Every week you spend $30*. You'd have to be caught and ticketed more often than once every five weeks in order to make this math not work out in your favor. And that is never going to happen, because there aren't nearly enough enforcement agents. As it is, the ones we have cost more than they make back. It's all a racket, but you'll notice the buses still aren't free because Albany is still in control of the MTA.
* I'm making a few assumptions here, first, that you're not sharing the same card among several family members with staggered schedules; once you spend $35 in a week on the same card, subsequent trips are free. Also, this is the full fare for most buses and trains, but not for the express bus.
I wrote what I thought was a fun and helpful comment somewhere on R3ddut. The mods decided it was written by AI so they removed it. Do I get a statue with three arms and six fingers per hand as a reward? Should I missspel more words in my next comment?
The Curve of the World is the last novel by the biologist and science fiction and fantasy writer Vonda N. McIntyre. As well as enjoying a long career as an influential SFF writer, winning Hugo and Nebula awards, she was a feminist organiser and activist within the SFF community and a pioneer in collective self-publishing online. She died in her hometown of Seattle in 2019, shortly before a new edition of her first novel, The Exile Waiting (1975), was published by me at Handheld Press. In 2022, the film The King’s Daughter, based on her 1997 novel The Moon and the Sun, starred Pierce Brosnan as Louis XIV encountering a race of aquatic humans. These “sea people” are recurring presences in McIntyre’s work, from her short stories “The Genius Freaks” (1973) and “The End’s Beginning” (1976) to one of her collaborations with her long-time friend Ursula Le Guin, “The Natural History and Extinction of the People of the Sea” (2008). The Curve of the World was a return to novel-length fiction, and while the sea people are almost invisible as active players, their legacy is crucial to the plot. They and this legacy are the sole fantasy elements in this novel. It is alternate history with a very light sprinkling of supernatural stardust.
In The Curve of the World, we encounter the Idaeans, a Minoan bull-dancing civilisation dominating trade routes and peace-keeping at the eastern end of the Sunset Sea, which we know as the Mediterranean. For those who need a time-anchor to keep themselves grounded, while this setting might be considered prehistoric it might also be early medieval. Writing exists but it is a technology for specialists, much like numeracy. In this world there is no trace of a Roman or Persian Empire, though Pharoah rules the Egyptians and is lazy about desilting the dangerously shallow sailing channel that in our timestream we have rebuilt as the Suez Canal. Moses, Christ, and Mohammed have not (yet?) appeared, and the Idaean worship of the Moon goddess seems to be one among several sophisticated placatory belief systems.
However, as Vonda says in the acknowledgements, “Do not try to match the Idaean timeline to ours because your head will explode.” Towards the end of the novel the protagonist Iakinthu, who holds the Idaean position of Gephyra (trade manager, chief negotiator, and political operator), mentions the conch-shell alarm system that was last used when a tsunami hit Knossos a thousand years ago. This might place the action of The Curve of the World at around the equivalent of 500 BCE in our timeline. However, we don’t know whether the “great wave” that Iakinthu speaks of is the same as the force of water thrown at Crete and the eastern Mediterranean by the immense eruption of Santorini in 1600 BCE. This is where our heads are at risk. Let’s move on to what we do know.
We can be sure that this period’s technology is Iron Age, using nothing that we don’t already know from archaeology. There is no gunpowder, no automated projectile weapons, no industrial metalsmithing. Sailing technology is well advanced, with clinker-built ships powered by large sails (which originated in the early fourth century CE in our timeline, but let’s not draw conclusions from that). Since it’s now considered that a full-size ship’s sail would take about a year to weave, that suggests the availability of a considerable labour economy, and indeed enslaving is a preoccupation in the plot, undertaken by, among others, black-sailed, leather-clad male barbarians. We don’t know how these antagonists navigate their ships, but their quarry, the Idaeans, have a secret. Iakinthu’s lover Aranthau, who captains her ship the Flying Fish, is descended from the sea people, and can read the routes and sense trouble ahead when he immerses himself in the deep. He can also, it turns out, negotiate, painfully, with sea monsters.
Iakinthu and her companions encounter a sea monster because they are on a voyage into the unknown. Iakinthu’s foster, or given, child Renthizu has reached manhood, and she has decided to return him to his mother so he can choose with which family he wants to live. On a trip to exchange other given children with the People (an allied tribe which I equate with the Bronze Age Scythians, or Amazons), the Flying Fish encounters its companion vessel the Dolphin in dire straits. It has been captured by the black-sailed barbarians, and its crew, their friends, have been murdered, their bodies pinned to the gunwales. The barbarians are overpowered by the crew of the Flying Fish, and after the violent battle a small and angry barbarian boy is rescued from the hold. He is recognised by Iakinthu’s given daughter Kilinkizu as her lost son, born to her in slavery. Iakinthu gives the boy a new name, Bdarde, bestowing it from her dear friend Bdarde-who-was, killed in the battle. But Bdarde-who-is proves livid to be given a woman’s name.
This is a matriarchal world. Pharoah is a woman. Among the People, for example, men’s activities are severely restricted and boy babies are kept for breeding and labouring only. In the more moderate Idaean culture, women are the decision-makers except where a man has special skills, such as in seafaring or languages. In Idaea, fatherhood is largely undiscussed and considered unimportant for a person’s place in society. Yet different cultures are intruding on the Idaean world. The black-sailed barbarians have a severely patriarchal and violent society in which women are slaves and work is strictly gendered. Bdarde-who-is has been brutalised and indoctrinated to scream obscenities at women and threaten their rape and torture by the crew of his father’s ships, when they come to get him. Since Kilinkizu cannot now relinquish her son again, and since she wants to keep her promise to return Renthizu to his unknown family, Iakinthu decides to stick to her plan. They will continue to sail across the Sunset Sea to the Horns of the Ocean (passing modern-day Gibraltar), and onward to the Sunset Country in the Untameable Ocean in the west.
This is an epic fantasy voyage from the cradle of human civilisation to the North American continent. The encounter with the sea monster is only one of Aranthau’s several painful discoveries that demonstrate his sea-people enhancements can be limited by natural forces. Likewise, the Idaeans’ revenge on the barbarians—and, let’s be clear about this, their kidnapping of the child they rename as Bdarde—brings trouble on their heads, no matter how pure their motivations and how sacred the bonds of mother and child.
I am not convinced by Kilinkizu’s recognition of the boy as her son, since her baby was taken from her, she says, at a day old. But this slight niggle demonstrates the problems with which the editors of The Curve of the World had to grapple. The draft of the novel was in its fifth iteration when Vonda died. In the foreword, Aqueduct’s publisher, the novelist L. Timmel Duchamp, describes the editing process that she and Nisi Shawl undertook with two other editors to get the text ready for publication. It’s not known how much patching and shaping they needed to do. I suspect that the “Knossos” mentioned above was a missed placeholder name in the text for the city named in the rest of the novel as Kunusu, in the Idaean heartland, one of many loose ends and undeveloped threads that presumably had to be left unfinished, since it wasn’t known what Vonda planned to do with them. The novel’s shape is fairly smooth, but it feels too long, with the truly powerful vitality of the first quarter diminishing through the remaining three quarters into a travelogue of strange peoples and natural wonders.
It is nonetheless a magnificent achievement. I first read The Curve of the World in three long sessions throughout one day. I could not put it down (well, I had to eat), because Vonda’s slow, deliberate worldbuilding is profoundly absorbing. Initially we assume that Iakinthu inhabits a perfect utopia for women, but the slow-burn hints about the repression of males in these cultures make the narrative feel genuinely urgent: After all, the volcano god is gendered male, and the cracks found each morning in the buildings are getting larger with every subtle earth tremor. Will the big one hit, and if so, when?
The imperative is to read on to find out what happens, and to discover what wonders Iakinthu and her companions will encounter next. But after the Nth dramatic encounter, the Mth strange wonder, and the Qth description of a communal meal or urgent sex (olive oil and red wine feature heavily in both), I was getting impatient. Travel is fine; wonders are wonderful, but if they don’t serve the plot, then why are they there?
There is certainly peril: The voyage past the erupting coastal volcano in what I think must be the Gulf of Mexico is a fantastic piece of writing, a superb reimagining of the effects of volcanic geology on frail sailing vessels. The threat of the barbarian ships who pursue the Flying Fish across the world is truly chilling, amped up by their echo, the irredeemably horrible child Bdarde-who-is. There is a tense period of forced fraternization with a people whose threat Vonda doesn’t need to spell out since we know what the Aztecs did with their captives’ hearts.
Vonda’s irrepressible love for devising alternate technologies seems to have been undimmed. I was charmed by the Idaeans’ vast, black water reservoir jars which squat on the roofs of their houses: so efficient, and so practical, and so civilised an indication of the desire for hot bath water. I was less convinced by the clever way of getting the Flying Fish across the neck of land currently occupied by the Panama Canal: This has the feel of a witty but impossible idea that Vonda refused to let go.
With so much olive oil being expended in bathing (strigils ahoy), eating, and giving as gifts (they carry a lot of gifts), I am also interested in the apparently infinite stowage capacity of the Flying Fish. The party meet a useful translator, whom they name Bridges Words, who can speak to them in this world’s universal trading language (a wise invention), and can somehow also speak all the languages they encounter up the west coast of North America. The point at which Bridges Words becomes Iakinthu’s personal Babel Fish was when I knew that Vonda had left the plot behind and was wholly focused on worldbuilding. And then the party meets two stranded Nipunu people, who wear kimono, who are called Genji and Murasaki. Really?
The Curve of the World begins as an intriguing and dramatic adventure and ends as a rather over-egged travelogue of wonders. It’s so sad that we won’t know any more about the Idaeans, or their extraordinary alternate world of cognate nations and civilisations. I thoroughly enjoyed the journey, even if I ultimately found myself regretful about some of its technical aspects.
In my defence, most of 2026 so far has been spent dealing with incapacitating levels of fatigue, which might finally be getting better (and that needs to be a separate post).
But the major problem is that I wanted to re-read Cascade, the first book in the trilogy, before starting Blight.
And while I loved Cascade -- here is my rave from way back when -- it produces an overwhelming sense of dread in me, even more than it did so on first read, because it captures, with remarkable precision and effectiveness, the sense of living in a liberal democracy that is teetering on the edge of ceasing to be one, and the stomach-dropping sensation when things begin moving unspeakably fast.
It's a very good book, but -- you see the problem.
Anyway, in recent weeks I finally got myself to re-read Cascade, and then I tore through Blight in a few days. Weirdly, I found it a much less difficult read because it's (both politically and environmentally) a post-apocalyptic novel, in which some kind of fightback is beginning.
Anyway it's fucking fantastic, without any of the common middle-book-of-a-trilogy doldrums. A really spectacular and unique mixture of wild magic, cosmic horror, and organizing for revolution, the last written with gritty specificity. The author is dead and all that, I don't know what's firsthand knowledge and what's research, but this is a book that (for example) writes with deep credibility about what it feels like to be in a crowd being tear-gassed.
As well as being a very good book, it also feels it's maybe a psychologically useful book to read right now.
I would like to do a proper write-up but I still have no idea what my energy's going to be doing day to day, so in the meantime here's a hype post, and if you want a review here's james_davis_nicoll's:
In the further adventures of home renovation, the back deck has been laid and now the roofing is being put up, for shade and to keep rain off the deck. It’s looking.. pretty good! There’s more to be done, obviously. But it’s coming along nicely.
Image: artsy shot of lilac buds (photo credit: Naomi Kritzer)
A few years ago, naomikritzer and I were talking about cherry blossom viewing (Hanami) in Japan. We were lamenting that we don't really do anything like that nation-wide in the US, even though there are plenty of places, like Washington, DC, which are intentionally planted with a lot of cherry trees. We decided that the only thing that comes close here in the Midwest is leaf peeping. People will follow maps of when peak leaf color is hitting various parts of the states and make destination trips to see the fall colors.
However, we wanted to do something in spring and decided that lilacs are kind of more like the Midwestern cherry tree. They're planted everywhere, even along the highways, and they come in lots of varieties. So, we've decided to make Lilac Hanami an annual thing. This is our second year.
Two dorks out enjoying the spring blossoms. (Photo credi: Naomi Kritzer)
Last year, we bought sushi at a grocery store and wandered up Summit Avenue to the lilac tunnels. Saint Paul, in its infinite wisdom, decided to chop those hundred year old lilacs down to the ground. I'd actually worried that they'd killed them. However, they do seem to be recovering, but they do not have the energy to produce flowers this year. So, we had to try a new place. Naomi found a park literally called Lilac Park. (https://restorelilacway.com/parks/renewed-lilac-park-formerly-roadside-park-st-louis-park-mn/about/). The drive over there was gorgeous. We went past the Lake of the Isles and all through some really fancy parts of Minneapolis.
The park itself is quite small, but the information about it is fascinating. It was established in 1939 and was once part of "Lilac Way" whixh was a bunch of intentional lilac plantings along Highway 100. It also happens to be right across fro the Nordic Wear factory.
We decided this year to home-make some of our treats. Naomi made both egg sandos and fruit sandos.
Image: fruit sandos
My onigiri were fun to make, but not as photogenic:
Image: home-made rice balls (in the background is visible egg sandos, Pocky. and a Korean fruit drink.)
It was a lovely way to spend an afternoon. There was a whole gaggle of fairly tame geese who were happy to eat our leftovers and, as we were leaving a giant tom turkey and hen showed up to strut around. We hung out for an hour or so just chatting about books (the new Murderbot being out), life, and such.
Having spent a fair amount of time last week finally doing some prep for forthcoming talk on condomz - well, at least pulling together existing visuals from former presentations and digging up a few fresh items to create suitable slides - get message that advance bookings are being very laggardly (apparently a problem with event programme generally?) and they may have to cancel.
SIGH, though I feel this is not lost work and may very well come in useful at some time.
And of course they may not have to cancel, bookings may pick up I suppose.
In rather more cheery news, a little while ago I bopped off an enquiry to The Academic Press with which I published The Co-authored Volume, since I have not heard from them for many a year, and in spite of the fact that lo, 'tis over twenty years now since it burst upon the world, it is still in print. (And still getting cited, yay.)
And I must say their website was a bit of a nightmare to navigate and I ended up sending a plaintive message to a very generic enquiry email as I could not find any other relevant one to apply to.
Behold, I have heard from an Accounts person that they sent a cheque to Former Workplace in 2020 (hah!) which was never cashed, surprise - what between lockdown and the various staff upheavals I was not at all astonished to hear this - but they have now sent me a statement of the royalties accruing (a very modest sum) and asking for my bank details.
Which is better than a bat in the eye with a burnt stick, do admit.
(I am not sure whether the royalties match up to the amounts earned for the same work via the Authors' Licensing and Copyright Society over the same period, but I am not sure that I am massively motivated to check.)
Nine complete .PDF graphic albums of the Atomic Robo comic series from Tesladyne LLC, plus the 2014 Atomic Robo RPG tabletop roleplaying game from Evil Hat Productions.