Date: 2009-03-05 11:52 pm (UTC)
Absolutely agreed that somebody who reads something that pisses them off enough to throw the book against the wall and posts about it has every right to their reaction, and to their voice.

Agreed as well that those who try to defend the author against accusations of racism (which weren't really made, and which the author felt no need to 'defend' against herself) are doing neither the author nor themselves any favors. Every reader is entitled to their own interpretation of the text, whatever the author's intent (unless perhaps they actually saw something that is completely contradicted by a plain reading of the text - had an interesting discussion once with somebody who interpreted Ged as an example of white privilege and had to be shown the passages where his skin and hair are actually described).

However, I don't think this is quite the right metaphor for the situation. Unless Elizabeth Bear is coming to your house to pick that book up and shove it back in front of your face, she IS NOT IN FACT STANDING ON YOUR FOOT AND REFUSING TO GET OFF.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

March 2022

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
131415 16171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 29th, 2025 10:44 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios